As gen AI takes over tasks that were once considered uniquely human, workers are starting to perceive their roles and their organizational value differently. Is that a good thing or a bad thing? To explore that question, we integrated psychological theories of motivation, performance, and well-being at work and interdisciplinary research on how gen AI affects knowledge, tasks, and the social characteristics of worker productivity and work itself. We found that a lot depends on whether workers feel that gen AI satisfies or frustrates three key psychological needs: competence (the feeling of being effective and capable); autonomy (the feeling of being in control of one’s actions); and relatedness (the feeling of having meaningful interpersonal connections). When those needs are met, employees embrace gen AI as a helpful tool and copilot. But when they’re not, employees feel threatened, at times even existentially, and balk at using gen AI.
An expert on Artificial Intelligence issued a horror warning that the technology...
1 Mins readArtificial intelligence apps are quickly becoming ubiquitous — for personal and enterprise use...
5 Mins readIn this interview, industry expert Dr. Anthony Grice explains how machine learning...
6 Mins readWith many Americans opposing the construction of giant AI data centers in...
2 Mins readGet our latest downloads and information first. Complete the form below to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.
Leave a comment