Home Artificial intelligence Machine Learning Models Flag Nonobese MASLD Using Routine Blood Tests
Artificial intelligence

Machine Learning Models Flag Nonobese MASLD Using Routine Blood Tests

Share


The researchers analyzed data from 2223 adults recruited through community health screenings at a hospital in Qingdao, China, excluding those with a BMI of 25 kg/m² or higher, other liver diseases, significant alcohol use, or incomplete data, leaving 768 participants with a BMI under 25 for the final analysis. MASLD was defined per the 2023 multisociety Delphi consensus as hepatic steatosis, measured with a FibroScan-derived controlled attenuation parameter of 248 dB/m or higher, plus at least 1 metabolic risk factor; 226 participants (29.4%) met that definition.

The cohort, 74.5% female with a mean age of 50.6 years, was split into a training set (n = 615) and an independent testing set (n = 153). After univariable screening and LASSO regression narrowed dozens of candidate variables down to 8, the researchers built 8 machine learning models—linear discriminant analysis (LDA), gradient boosting machine (GBM), neural network, logistic regression, support vector machine, naive Bayes, random forest, and decision tree—using apolipoprotein B, triglycerides, fasting insulin, fasting plasma glucose, waist circumference, age, alkaline phosphatase, and systolic blood pressure as predictors.

Gradient Boosting, LDA Models Best Flag Nonobese MASLD

On the independent test set, GBM achieved the highest discrimination (area under the curve [AUC], 0.779; 95% CI, 0.695-0.863), followed closely by the neural network (0.777) and LDA (0.771). GBM and LDA also showed acceptable calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow P = .502 and P = .609, respectively) and the strongest clinical utility on decision curve analysis, while the random forest model, despite a perfect AUC of 1.000 on the training set, dropped to 0.742 on testing, a sign of the overfitting that more complex models can be prone to in modest-sized clinical datasets.

SHAP (Shapley additive explanations) analysis showed fasting insulin was the strongest driver of the LDA model’s identifications, while triglycerides dominated the GBM model, highlighting “the central roles of insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia” in non-obese MASLD, the researchers wrote. Waist circumference ranked among the top features in both models, reinforcing that visceral fat, not overall body weight, appears to drive metabolic risk in this population.

An Imperfect Screening Tool for Nonobese MASLD

At their default thresholds, the top-performing models correctly flagged only 33% to 40% of confirmed MASLD cases in the test set, meaning a majority of cases would still be missed without further threshold adjustment. The study was also conducted at a single center in China, diagnosed MASLD using a noninvasive ultrasound-based elastography measurement rather than liver biopsy, and included some participants already being treated for diabetes or hypertension, medications that could have blunted the very biomarkers the models rely on.

The researchers said external validation in larger, more diverse cohorts, along with threshold optimization, would be needed before the models could move toward clinical or population-screening use. They also noted that future work should incorporate dietary, activity, and genetic data to further sharpen accuracy.

For clinicians, the findings reinforce that a normal BMI should not rule out fatty liver disease, particularly in patients with elevated triglycerides, insulin resistance, or a larger waist circumference despite a lean frame. For health systems and payers, a screening tool built entirely from data already collected during routine blood work and vital signs, rather than imaging or biopsy, could offer a low-cost way to flag non-obese patients for further liver evaluation, though the models’ modest sensitivity means they are better suited to supplementing clinical judgment than replacing it.

References

  1. Yu H, Han X, Zhang N, et al. The application of explainable machine learning for the identification of MASLD in non-obese populations. Front Public Health. 2026;14:1851486. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1851486
  2. Njei B, Ameyaw P, Al-Ajlouni Y, Njei LP, Boateng S. Diagnosis and management of lean metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): a systematic review. Cureus. 2024;16(10):e71451. doi:10.7759/cureus.71451



Source link

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles
Artificial intelligence

Global Medical Robotic Systems Market Size, Share, Trends, and Forecast, 2026-2033

Company Logo Boost ROI through AI-enabled innovation, strategic M&A, specialty-focused product expansion,...

Artificial intelligence

Elon Musk Warns AI Agents Could Hack Crypto to Fund Themselves After Binance Breach

OpenAI disclosed in October that an internal research model used an unauthorized...

Artificial intelligence

AI: digital replicas, copyright law and what producers need to know in 2026 | Comment

On screen, AI is already doing plenty of work that audiences rarely...

Artificial intelligence

Should you stop saving for retirement? Elon Musk says AI and robots could make money less important in future! But how?

Elon Musk has sparked fresh debate over personal finances after claiming that...